bush

Talking points for Obama Bush meeting today

  • Can you believe it's fifty degrees today? How unseasonably warm for November!
  • Alabama or Texas Tech?
  • No, no I don't think we'll need Secret Service to keep our daughters out of bars. Maybe in the second term when they hit their tweens?
  • Seen any good movies lately?
  • Thanks for that secret CIA order authorizing the military to go after Al-Qaeda through clandestine ops in 15 to 20 countries with whom we already have tenuous and arguably hostile relations! I so enjoy challenges.
  • Nice drapes.
  • Have you got any more hand sanitizer?
  • Did I mention it was unseasonably warm?

Outrageous and Deadly Ignorance No. 2

And while the Bush administration is busy engineering (and concealing) a sky-rocketing reemergence in the HIV/AIDs rate in this country, they're also shopping around plans to increase the rate of unplanned pregnancies.

The administration through HHS is shopping around a back-door federal regulation to allow physicians, pharmacists and other medical care providers (Catholic hospitals, anyone?) to refuse to prescribe, NOT just the morning-after pill which is NOT an abortifacient, but straight up birth control too.

Outrageous and Deadly Ignorance

Coming right at the heels of my last semi-related post, the CDC announced today that according to a study it's had since October, that, oops! the number of HIV/AIDS infections in this country has been underestimated-- for at least the past 5 years-- by 15,000 people. So that's actually 75,000 cases they just... missed.

This systematic negligence is worse than the administration's reaction to Hurricane Katrina. And the public health and economic implications will be worse too.

Do you take sugar with your brain cancer and massive oil spills?

Through a number of executive orders, and with the participation of the most pro-business Supreme Court in history, the Bush Administration is attempting to limit the right to sue for damages caused by products if such products have already been approved by the FDA.

The understaffed agency that has no sanctioning recourse against products if, after approval, they do turn out to cause harm.

Things like baby bottles.

And while we're compiling all the agencies who should be regulating a product, the EPA jumps in. Their toxicologist- Dr. Earl Gray!- notes his personal concern, but off record so as not to imply that the EPA takes issue with the Executive Office's decision to continue supporting the production of this hazardous chemical to go into the mouths of babies. Perhaps because while the threat is real, he's not?

Syndicate content