<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>I Heart Irony</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iheartirony.com"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.iheartirony.com/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.iheartirony.com/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-09-24T22:12:50-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Emily learns to write press release: Jesse sleeps while dinner cools on table</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iheartirony.com/content/emily-learns-write-press-release-jesse-sleeps-while-dinner-cools-table" />
    <id>http://www.iheartirony.com/content/emily-learns-write-press-release-jesse-sleeps-while-dinner-cools-table</id>
    <published>2009-07-09T00:34:44-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-07-09T01:05:42-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>emily</name>
    </author>
    <category term="chicken" />
    <category term="politics" />
    <category term="soccer" />
    <category term="summer" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE<br />
July 8, 2009<br />
<strong>Emily learns to write press release:<br />
Jesse sleeps while dinner cools on table</strong><br />
(New York)  Emily, occupationally banished, learned how to write a press release while her tired and over-worked spouse, Jesse, took an extended nap.<br />
On Wednesday, July 8, 2009 at 11:30 pm, Emily completed a dinner of Moroccan chicken kebabs, summer vegetables and couscous.  According to witnesses, she then googled the following site: “Wiki: How to Write a Press Release”.<br />
When reached for comment, Emily said: “I’m pleased to have learned this invaluable skill.  Everyone should learn how to write a press release while dinner gets extremely cold.  Especially when dinner involves perfectly-cooked grains that don’t reheat well.”</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE  </p>
<p>July 8, 2009</p>
<p><strong>Emily learns to write press release:<br />
Jesse sleeps while dinner cools on table</strong></p>
<p>(New York)  Emily, occupationally banished, learned how to write a press release while her tired and over-worked spouse, Jesse, took an extended nap.  </p>
<p>On Wednesday, July 8, 2009 at 11:30 pm, Emily completed a dinner of Moroccan chicken kebabs, summer vegetables and couscous.  According to witnesses, she then googled the following site: “Wiki: How to Write a Press Release”.</p>
<p>When reached for comment, Emily said: “I’m pleased to have learned this invaluable skill.  Everyone should learn how to write a press release while dinner gets extremely cold.  Especially when dinner involves perfectly-cooked grains that don’t reheat well.”</p>
<p>Emily was unable to comment further at Top Chef Masters was on, and “making her feel really, really untalented.”</p>
<p>In conjunction with sleeping through the dinner, Jesse noted: “ZZZZZZZZ.”</p>
<p>As Jesse slept, USA defeated Nicaragua 2-0 at RFK stadium.</p>
<p>Photos of the completely cold dinner: <a href="http://yfrog.com/5himg0163uj">http://yfrog.com/5himg0163uj</a>.</p>
<p>###</p>
<p>Press Contact: <a href="http://twitter.com/emilydemery">http://twitter.com/emilydemery</a></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Iowa Supreme Court unanimously upholds the right of equal marriage access</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iheartirony.com/content/iowa-supreme-court-unanimously-upholds-right-equal-marriage-access" />
    <id>http://www.iheartirony.com/content/iowa-supreme-court-unanimously-upholds-right-equal-marriage-access</id>
    <published>2009-04-03T10:41:35-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-04-03T10:41:35-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>emily</name>
    </author>
    <category term="gay rights" />
    <category term="LGBT" />
    <category term="marriage" />
    <category term="politics" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/7206/bildeu.jpg" /><br />
Photo source: Rodney White of the Des Moines Register<br />
Today's a really happy day for everyone.  Including <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_animals">penguins</a>.<br />
<img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/69/Manchot_01.jpg/630px-Manchot_01.jpg" /><br />
Also, it makes me giggle that he wants Iowa Governor Chet Culver to "man up" to fix this whole gay marriage thing.  Yum!</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/7206/bildeu.jpg" /><br />
Photo source: Rodney White of the Des Moines Register</p>
<p>Today's a really happy day for everyone.  Including <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_animals">penguins</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/69/Manchot_01.jpg/630px-Manchot_01.jpg" /></p>
<p>Also, it makes me giggle that he wants Iowa Governor Chet Culver to "man up" to fix this whole gay marriage thing.  Yum!</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Analyzing the Monumental Suck of the BSG Finale (SPOILERS WARNING)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iheartirony.com/content/analyzing-monumental-suck-bsg-finale-spoilers-warning" />
    <id>http://www.iheartirony.com/content/analyzing-monumental-suck-bsg-finale-spoilers-warning</id>
    <published>2009-03-22T15:23:26-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-03-23T17:03:37-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
    </author>
    <category term="bad ending" />
    <category term="battlestar galactica" />
    <category term="bsg" />
    <category term="cop out" />
    <category term="dan simmons" />
    <category term="deus ex machina" />
    <category term="finale" />
    <category term="god" />
    <category term="hyperion" />
    <category term="keeping america stupid" />
    <category term="matrix" />
    <category term="monumental suck" />
    <category term="religion" />
    <category term="ron moore" />
    <category term="science fiction" />
    <category term="stupid" />
    <category term="suck" />
    <category term="terminator" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://iheartirony.com/files/bsg-finale-humor.jpg" align="left" border="0" alt=" God sez be nice to teh robotz. k thx bai" /> (Fair warning, this post not only contains BSG spoilers, but spoilers for <em>The Matrix</em> and <em>Hyperion Cantos</em> as well). For the last several years I have been telling anyone who would listen to watch <em>Battlestar Galactica</em>, that it was the "best show ever on tv, SF or not." Now, I have to say "it's the best show ever on tv, right up until the stupid, horrible, retarded ending."</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://iheartirony.com/files/bsg-finale-humor.jpg" align="left" border="0" alt=" God sez be nice to teh robotz. k thx bai" /> (Fair warning, this post not only contains BSG spoilers, but spoilers for <em>The Matrix</em> and <em>Hyperion Cantos</em> as well). For the last several years I have been telling anyone who would listen to watch <em>Battlestar Galactica</em>, that it was the "best show ever on tv, SF or not." Now, I have to say "it's the best show ever on tv, right up until the stupid, horrible, retarded ending."</p>
<p>First off, I should caveat that the character treatment was pretty good. Yeah, I cried too when Adama and Lee said goodbye and when Roslin died. This is a testament to the acting, direction, overall fantastic execution that BSG maintained throughout the entire series, and ultimately to the ties that the series built between the audience and the characters.</p>
<p>I'm going to try and not repeat too much of what has already been pointed out at <a href="http://io9.com/5178522/as-battlestar-ends-god-is-in-the-detail">io9</a> and <a href="http://ideas.4brad.com/battlestar/good-bad-horrible">Brad Ideas</a>, both by the authors and commenters - and probably many other places for that matter. Yes, it was Deus ex Machina at nearly its worst, only being eclipsed by an it-was-all-a-dream ending or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Westphall#The_Tommy_Westphall_Universe_Hypothesis">an autistic kid with a snow globe</a>. But there is extra special annoying in BSG's God-as Deus ex Machina, since for all intents and purposes, Ron Moore <strong>is</strong> the God in the BSG universe (even cameo-ing with the angels in the final sequence). That's great Ron, I'm happy for your ability to literarily autofellate at the expense of your audience.</p>
<p>On a minor aside, Daybreak Pt. 3 took awhile longer than Pt. 2 to show up on AppleTV and, as a result, for a good 10 minutes I actually thought Cavil agreeing to the truce was the end of the show (yes, I wasn't watching the clock or the running time). In retrospect I really wish that had been the case, although in fairness that would have pissed me off too, just less so than the whole "bah, who needs starships, let's all split up and live off the land and leave a dozen open mysteries hanging" ending.</p>
<p>I've thought for some time now that the Man vs. Machine, or perhaps "Man vs. Man's Creations,"(?) plot has been the preeminent fictional plot of modern times, starting chonologically with Mary Shelley's <em>Frankenstein</em>. In my view, outside of BSG, there are three major pieces of contemporary fiction telling this story: <em>The Terminator</em> series, <em>The Matrix</em> trilogy, and <em>The Hyperion Cantos</em>. Rather than just sit here and bash and rail BSG in of itself, I'm going to try and compare and contrast BSG with these other three works, in an effort to show why its ending fails on such a monumental level and how it could have been much, much better.</p>
<p>In an odd twist, <em>The Terminator</em> story could now actually fall quite well into the BSG universe as our version of "all of this will happen again." The original movie should probably be credited with putting the idea that our creations could get out of our control squarely into public awareness (<em>2001</em> could also make this claim, although it is tricky since this was Kubrick's interest in that individual movie, and the overall story was about a whole lot more). From a purely literary standpoint, <em>The Terminator</em> clearly falls way behind our other two examples and BSG. The overall story is still going as a franchise with another movie forthcoming and, unless I'm missing something, has never really tried to do more than provide a nod of the head to the loftier questions surrounding the idea of humans' creations turning against us. It's essentially a more intelligent, darker version of Hollywood's Shit Blows Up genre. Interestingly, for this reason, it doesn't have the same problems as BSG. Because <em>The Terminator</em> never tried to get too deep into meaning or philosophy, it essentially works.</p>
<p><em>The Matrix</em> was wildly more intellectually ambitious than <em>The Terminator</em>. <em>The Matrix</em> made allusions to everything from <em>The Bible</em> to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Simulacra-Simulation-Body-Theory-Materialism/dp/0472065211/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1237741604&amp;sr=8-1">modern philosophy</a>, all of which have been documented and analyzed ad nauseum. The trilogy had a few very fundamental problems (for example, the "humans as a battery" makes no scientific sense) that most fans were willing to roll with as a conceit. The second and third movies got fairly derailed from a quality standpoint by being too impressed with themselves and having some major "huh?" moments (why use Sentinels to destroy Zion? Why not just drop a bomb or a virus or something?) and some spectacularly campy lines ("she's got a fat ass") that seemed to cheapen the depth and gravitas that the first movie had established. Despite these flaws, the story as a whole essentially held together and followed its own rules. The prophecies were placed by pro-peace machines/programs and the Neo character was essentially engineered to break cycle and establish the ultimate victory of freewill and choice over predestination and mathematical predictability. The final film did not answer all of the open questions, but it answered everything required to make the story work and left plenty of things for fans to interpret as they saw fit (e.g. was The Merovingian and earlier version of The Architect? And was Seraph a parallel early Neo?). This final point is where BSG falls flat on its face in comparison to <em>The Matrix</em>. Rather than tying up all of the mysteries and string pulling, BSG just goes "hey, God is real and can't control everything, but there are angels and miraculous events to nudge the outcome." And Hera is our Earth's Mitochondrial Eve. And watch out for robots!!! And... that's it. On one level, I give BSG some credit for the sheer scope of trying to tie together the two universes and spanning 150,000 years. But just saying "God is real and look! Angels!" is horrifically messy. <em>The Matrix</em> had religious elements, such as prophecies, miraculous powers, and "the Chosen One." These elements worked <strong>within</strong> the confines of the rules of the story. BSG's religious mechanisms are all over the place. Are God and the angels aliens? Older versions of a resolved "all this has happened before and will happen again" cycle? Are the miraculous events in BSG part of some superscience that is indistinguishable from magic or are they... miracles? Is God really just... God? It certainly appears that way. The show made no attempt to be mysterious and by all accounts one has to take it at face value that they are angels, the miracles are miracles, and God is God, even he hates that name (huh?). In which case, BSG, in every sense of the definition of the term, ceased to be "science fiction." The moment you remove the possibility of scientific explanation from your story's events, you've taken the "science" out and you're left with "fiction."</p>
<p>Up until BSG I considered <em>The Hyperion Cantos</em> the single best piece of science fiction in existence. Once it became obvious just how good BSG was, I placed it into a category where it could eclipse Hyperion, depending on how BSG played out. I obviously feel it has fallen very disappointingly short. What the resolution of the Hyperion story pulled off was to brilliantly weave together the characters' destinies with the plot points. All of the emotional punch was partnered with extremely important plot outcomes. At many levels, I thought BSG was borrowing heavily from the Hyperion story, to the point that I thought that Hera was most likely going to serve the same mechanical role as Aenea. In the Hyperion Universe, the character Aenea is the offspring of a human and an AI character (sound familiar?), and carries a virus which holds the key to breaking the Catholic Church's and the TechnoCore's (the Hyperion universe's machine organization) power over humanity, essentially through love. The outcome manages to be beautiful, sad, horrifying, and hopeful all at once - <strong>and</strong> it holds together and provides resolution and closure to the entire story. BSG gives us essentially decent character resolution (I still think Kara's individual outcome was phenomenally stupid) and then proceeds to throw the entire rest of itself into a little "watch our for excess and abuse" parable told through the eyes of angels in the context of a semi-omnipotent God. We need to watch out for what we create? Really? The <strong>entire</strong> series doesn't serve as enough of a warning or connection to our own world that I need to be shown some shots of contemporary robots? <strong>Really?</strong></p>
<p>One last note on Dan Simmons comparisons. His <em>Ilium/Olympos</em> books don't really fall into this general plot category, but they do possess a device that is worth noting: The Greek Gods are <strong>real</strong> in these books. They are super advanced future humans playing around with very advanced quantum and nano technologies to actually play out the <em>Iliad</em>. They really appear to the characters and, for example, Achilles is so hard to kill because they have interfered with his quantum probability field. This sort of device would have much more acceptable for the "one true God" and the Baltar/Caprica Head Angels. It would have stretched the established themes of the show, but it would have worked much better than the goofy ending that Moore decided on.</p>
<p>In truth, I think I sensed this coming. My excitement about new episodes has been diminishing episode by episode since the second half of season four started. In the back of my mind I could sense that they were running out of airtime to properly clean up all of the plot threads and that it was heading towards some sort of awful cop-out. It's a testament to the quality of the first 3 1/2 seasons that I held out hope that there would be some sort of brilliant end that would make it all work.</p>
<p>Overall, I still have to BSG a phenomenal amount of credit for legitimizing and popularizing science fiction to a much broader popular audience (it won a Peabody for crying out loud!). The fact that Emily was completely hooked on the show speaks volumes to its quality as a body of work. This is probably what ultimately upsets me so much about an ending which pulls so much of the "science" out of what was up until the last few minutes, easily the best "science fiction" ever put on TV. Hell, even without resolving all the mysteries they could have just left it with the "angel" Baltar/Caprica just telling the real Balter and Caprica "you aren't ready for the knowledge of what we are yet" instead of literally inserting the supernatural.</p>
<p>How would I have ended it? I will work on that in a forthcoming post, if for no other reason than this one is epically long. <a href="http://ideas.4brad.com/battlestar/how-would-i-end-it">Brad has a good list</a>, which it is worth noting that he wrote before the finale.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Talking points for Obama Bush meeting today </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iheartirony.com/content/talking-points-obama-bush-meeting-today" />
    <id>http://www.iheartirony.com/content/talking-points-obama-bush-meeting-today</id>
    <published>2008-11-10T11:02:53-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-10T11:08:37-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>emily</name>
    </author>
    <category term="bush" />
    <category term="obama" />
    <category term="politics" />
    <category term="presidency" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Can you believe it's fifty degrees today?  How unseasonably warm for November!</li>
<li>Alabama or Texas Tech?</li>
<li>No, no I don't think we'll need Secret Service to keep our daughters out of bars.  Maybe in the second term when they hit their tweens?</li>
<li><strike>Seen any good <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jun/29/entertainment/ca-w29">movies</a> lately?</strike></li>
<li>Thanks for that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/us/politics/10transition.html?partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink">secret CIA order</a> authorizing the military to go after Al-Qaeda through clandestine ops in 15 to 20 countries with whom we already have tenuous and arguably hostile relations!  I so enjoy challenges.</li>
<li>Nice drapes.</li>
<li>Have you got any more <a href="http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/11/09/bush-obama-meeting-hard-feelings-hand-sanitier/">hand sanitizer</a>?</li>
<li>Did I mention it was unseasonably warm?</li>
</ul>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Can you believe it's fifty degrees today?  How unseasonably warm for November!</li>
<li>Alabama or Texas Tech?</li>
<li>No, no I don't think we'll need Secret Service to keep our daughters out of bars.  Maybe in the second term when they hit their tweens?</li>
<li><strike>Seen any good <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jun/29/entertainment/ca-w29">movies</a> lately?</strike></li>
<li>Thanks for that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/us/politics/10transition.html?partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink">secret CIA order</a> authorizing the military to go after Al-Qaeda through clandestine ops in 15 to 20 countries with whom we already have tenuous and arguably hostile relations!  I so enjoy challenges.</li>
<li>Nice drapes.</li>
<li>Have you got any more <a href="http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/11/09/bush-obama-meeting-hard-feelings-hand-sanitier/">hand sanitizer</a>?</li>
<li>Did I mention it was unseasonably warm?</li>
</ul>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Should states just do away with marriage completely?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iheartirony.com/content/should-states-just-do-away-marriage-completely" />
    <id>http://www.iheartirony.com/content/should-states-just-do-away-marriage-completely</id>
    <published>2008-11-09T12:23:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-09T12:29:42-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
    </author>
    <category term="bigotry" />
    <category term="civil unions" />
    <category term="gay marriage" />
    <category term="LGBT" />
    <category term="marriage" />
    <category term="politics" />
    <category term="prop 8" />
    <category term="same-sex marriage" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Nestled into the historic euphoria of Tuesday's mandate-level win (presidency and increases in both houses of Congress) was the 4-state loss banning same-sex marriage or same-sex adoptions, most notably Prop 8 in California. There have been a lot of protests since then and the LGBT community has been galvanized and is organizing well. This issue is also touching heavily on religion as it always does, but particularly also on the separation of church and state, with Church of Latter Day Saints pumping millions into the Yes effort on Prop 8. This effort looks to be a clear violation of their tax-exempt status. The LDS is a 501c3, which, without getting overly detailed is the "non-political" non-profit type, meaning it is not supposed to lobby:</p>
<blockquote><p>
In general, no organization, including a church, may qualify for IRC section 501(c)(3) status if a substantial part of its activities is attempting to influence legislation (commonly known as lobbying).
</p></blockquote>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Nestled into the historic euphoria of Tuesday's mandate-level win (presidency and increases in both houses of Congress) was the 4-state loss banning same-sex marriage or same-sex adoptions, most notably Prop 8 in California. There have been a lot of protests since then and the LGBT community has been galvanized and is organizing well. This issue is also touching heavily on religion as it always does, but particularly also on the separation of church and state, with Church of Latter Day Saints pumping millions into the Yes effort on Prop 8. This effort looks to be a clear violation of their tax-exempt status. The LDS is a 501c3, which, without getting overly detailed is the "non-political" non-profit type, meaning it is not supposed to lobby:</p>
<blockquote><p>
In general, no organization, including a church, may qualify for IRC section 501(c)(3) status if a substantial part of its activities is attempting to influence legislation (commonly known as lobbying).
</p></blockquote>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1828.pdf">IRS</a>.</p>
<p>So that's the current state of this divisive issue. It's an issue that, personally, incites quite a bit of anger in me. I don't see what business the state has, at all, in determining the "moral" parameters of marriage. The entire notion is absurd, hateful, stupid, bigoted, and all around assinine. As Lewis Black so eloquently put how absurd this issue is: "surely if we can keep the queers from marrying, all our other problems will go away."</p>
<p>And boy, do we have other problems to be worrying about. The economy, two wars, health care, energy, education, environment, etc. I could probably spend four posts on the thing left out of that list. Yet, here we are again arguing about who is allowed to love, fuck, marry, and have children with whom.</p>
<p>In taking all this in, I had a thought: just have the states ban all marriage. Take the word out of the states' legal lexicons. Only have the states grant civil-unions (or whatever you want to call it), upgrading these legal bindings to the exact same status as is currently granted to marriage, also looping in retro-status: "all rights currently granted by employers and other entities to married couples now apply retroactively to couples in civil unions" (I'm not a lawyer, so I will never get the language right). In short, take the power of the word "marriage" away from the bigots. Take the fight out of the legislatures and courtrooms and move it to the churches where it belongs. </p>
<p>I completely accept that this solution has the following problems:</p>
<ul>
<li>It may be legally impossible (I'm not in a position to know, so I'm throwing it out there as an idea).</li>
<li>It's a symbolic cop-out, basically ceding the power of the word to the bigots.</li>
</ul>
<p>On the other hand, it would accomplish the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Attain full legal status for the same-sex version of what is currently known as "marriage."</li>
<li>Take the issue away from the Right in its use as a distraction and wedge tactic.</li>
<li>Move the issue to the bigots own turf: their churches. It will be a much longer, drawn-out fight there, but will become purely a symbolic fight, rather than the fight for rights as it currently is in the states.</li>
</ul>
<p>Just an idea.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Thinking about history</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iheartirony.com/content/thinking-about-history" />
    <id>http://www.iheartirony.com/content/thinking-about-history</id>
    <published>2008-11-05T00:33:13-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-05T00:33:13-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
    </author>
    <category term="america" />
    <category term="history" />
    <category term="obama" />
    <category term="perspective" />
    <category term="presidency" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>7 years, 1 month, and 25 days ago; a few hours after watching the second of the Twin Towers fall, I told my father "today is the most significant moment I will see in my life." Today, I think I stand transcendentally corrected. As tragic, violent and world-changing that 9/11 was, today stands on its own in history in a hopeful, peaceful, united way.<br />
Yes we can.<br />
Yes we did.<br />
Yes we are.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>7 years, 1 month, and 25 days ago; a few hours after watching the second of the Twin Towers fall, I told my father "today is the most significant moment I will see in my life." Today, I think I stand transcendentally corrected. As tragic, violent and world-changing that 9/11 was, today stands on its own in history in a hopeful, peaceful, united way.</p>
<p>Yes we can.</p>
<p>Yes we did.</p>
<p>Yes we are.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>I believe in the idea of America again</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iheartirony.com/content/i-believe-idea-america-again" />
    <id>http://www.iheartirony.com/content/i-believe-idea-america-again</id>
    <published>2008-11-04T23:12:11-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-04T23:12:11-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
    </author>
    <category term="barack obama" />
    <category term="election" />
    <category term="history" />
    <category term="obama" />
    <category term="politics" />
    <category term="president" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what else to say.<br />
Tears all around here.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what else to say.</p>
<p>Tears all around here.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fox calls Ohio for Obama, that does it, Obama is going to be next president, unofficially</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iheartirony.com/content/fox-calls-ohio-obama-does-it-obama-going-be-next-president-unofficially" />
    <id>http://www.iheartirony.com/content/fox-calls-ohio-obama-does-it-obama-going-be-next-president-unofficially</id>
    <published>2008-11-04T21:24:06-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-04T21:24:06-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
    </author>
    <category term="election" />
    <category term="mccain" />
    <category term="obama" />
    <category term="president" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>That's it. That puts Obama at 195 called. Add in:<br />
CA 55<br />
OR 7<br />
WA 11<br />
IA 7<br />
= 271!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br />
In other news, the big three Senate races are not going well for the Dems.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>That's it. That puts Obama at 195 called. Add in:</p>
<p>CA 55<br />
OR 7<br />
WA 11<br />
IA 7</p>
<p>= 271!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>In other news, the big three Senate races are not going well for the Dems.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Some times things crystallize suddenly in one&#039;s mind</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iheartirony.com/content/some-times-things-crystallize-suddenly-ones-mind" />
    <id>http://www.iheartirony.com/content/some-times-things-crystallize-suddenly-ones-mind</id>
    <published>2008-11-04T19:01:45-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-04T19:01:45-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
    </author>
    <category term="choice" />
    <category term="election" />
    <category term="mccain" />
    <category term="obama" />
    <category term="politics" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Leaving the voting booth this morning it hit me. Today was about a simple choice:<br />
- Vote for cynicism, fear, division and handing over one's fate to others, under the guise of "protecting us".<br />
- Vote for hope, self-empowerment and unity.<br />
It's really that simple.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Leaving the voting booth this morning it hit me. Today was about a simple choice:</p>
<p>- Vote for cynicism, fear, division and handing over one's fate to others, under the guise of "protecting us".</p>
<p>- Vote for hope, self-empowerment and unity.</p>
<p>It's really that simple.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Election Day: November 4, 2008</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iheartirony.com/content/election-day-november-4-2008" />
    <id>http://www.iheartirony.com/content/election-day-november-4-2008</id>
    <published>2008-11-04T00:13:21-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-04T00:13:21-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>emily</name>
    </author>
    <category term="2008 election" />
    <category term="hope" />
    <category term="obama" />
    <category term="politics" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It's finally- unbelievably- wonderfully here.  In four and a half hours, Jesse and I will go stand in line to cast our vote for Barack Obama for President of the United State of America.<br />
And this morning makes me think of another amazing morning for America, Bill Clinton's inauguration.  And so, without further ado, the closing salvo to Maya Angelou's <a href="http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=AngPuls.sgm&amp;images=images/modeng&amp;data=/texts/english/modeng/parsed&amp;tag=public&amp;part=all">"On the Pulse of the Morning"</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><br />
Here, on the pulse of this new day<br />
You may have the grace to look up and out<br />
And into your sister's eyes, and into<br />
Your brother's face, your country<br />
And say simply<br />
Very simply<br />
With hope --<br />
Good morning.<br />
</em></p></blockquote>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It's finally- unbelievably- wonderfully here.  In four and a half hours, Jesse and I will go stand in line to cast our vote for Barack Obama for President of the United State of America.</p>
<p>And this morning makes me think of another amazing morning for America, Bill Clinton's inauguration.  And so, without further ado, the closing salvo to Maya Angelou's <a href="http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=AngPuls.sgm&amp;images=images/modeng&amp;data=/texts/english/modeng/parsed&amp;tag=public&amp;part=all">"On the Pulse of the Morning"</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em></p>
<p>Here, on the pulse of this new day<br />
You may have the grace to look up and out<br />
And into your sister's eyes, and into<br />
Your brother's face, your country<br />
And say simply<br />
Very simply<br />
With hope --<br />
Good morning. </p>
<p></em></p></blockquote>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>On being fabulously busy with democracy and such and therefore not posting a word since September</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iheartirony.com/content/being-fabulously-busy-democracy-and-such-and-therefore-not-posting-word-september" />
    <id>http://www.iheartirony.com/content/being-fabulously-busy-democracy-and-such-and-therefore-not-posting-word-september</id>
    <published>2008-10-31T11:13:03-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-10-31T11:13:03-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>emily</name>
    </author>
    <category term="2008 election" />
    <category term="hope" />
    <category term="obama" />
    <category term="politics" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Can't talk, too busy being hopey.<br />
Fortunately, other people have time on their hands.  Time to take trips to New York to commit sacrilege for capitalism.<br />
<object width="425" height="344"></p>
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yuSDQzJDB80&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yuSDQzJDB80&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
Yay Dan for finding this gem of a societal clusterbomb.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Can't talk, too busy being hopey.</p>
<p>Fortunately, other people have time on their hands.  Time to take trips to New York to commit sacrilege for capitalism.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><br />
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yuSDQzJDB80&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yuSDQzJDB80&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Yay Dan for finding this gem of a societal clusterbomb.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>iheartirony.com to the House of Representatives: you should all be ashamed (meant UN-ironically, in case that was in doubt)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iheartirony.com/content/iheartironycom-house-representatives-you-should-all-be-ashamed-meant-un-ironically-case-was-" />
    <id>http://www.iheartirony.com/content/iheartironycom-house-representatives-you-should-all-be-ashamed-meant-un-ironically-case-was-</id>
    <published>2008-09-30T13:37:53-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-09-30T13:37:53-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
    </author>
    <category term="bailout" />
    <category term="clusterfuck" />
    <category term="credit markets" />
    <category term="economy" />
    <category term="FAIL!" />
    <category term="house of representatives" />
    <category term="shame" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Something that I've pointed out conversationally several times over the course of the bailout dialogue has been that the question shouldn't be "can we afford it?" The question has to be "Can we afford <strong>not</strong> to do it?" This was evidenced in real terms by the Dow closing down nearly 800 points yesterday. Bailout = approximately $700 billion, with the possibility of getting some of that back. No bailout = $1.1 trillion in lost market value (taking into consideration Nasdaq and S&amp;P losses). Of course, the market has rebounded a bit today, but don't think that means things are okay. That's just investors grabbing some (perceived?) deals and being optimistic that there might be another vote this week.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Something that I've pointed out conversationally several times over the course of the bailout dialogue has been that the question shouldn't be "can we afford it?" The question has to be "Can we afford <strong>not</strong> to do it?" This was evidenced in real terms by the Dow closing down nearly 800 points yesterday. Bailout = approximately $700 billion, with the possibility of getting some of that back. No bailout = $1.1 trillion in lost market value (taking into consideration Nasdaq and S&amp;P losses). Of course, the market has rebounded a bit today, but don't think that means things are okay. That's just investors grabbing some (perceived?) deals and being optimistic that there might be another vote this week.</p>
<p>Don't get me wrong, the plan was far from ideal, but nearly every economist who looked at it said it was better than doing...Uh, or right... Nothing! Also, most economists seem to agree that the longer it takes to do something the more expensive it's going to get. LIBOR shot up yesterday and the TED spread is back up over 300 bps. If something isn't done soon we're going to see things a lot worse than the Sun going out of business. Give it 1-3 weeks and you're going to see a large company not be able to take out a short-term loan and whammo, they're going to miss payroll.</p>
<p>So, to the House of Representatives: shame on you. Shame, shame shame. You put your own ideologies and short-term political capital ahead of the economic health of every day Americans at a mind-boggling level. If you had angry constituents calling about bailing out bankers, maybe instead of capitulating you should have attempted to educate them.</p>
<p>Fools. This is all madness and history will lay it on your heads.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&quot;we’ve become a banana republic with nukes&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iheartirony.com/content/we%E2%80%99ve-become-banana-republic-nukes" />
    <id>http://www.iheartirony.com/content/we%E2%80%99ve-become-banana-republic-nukes</id>
    <published>2008-09-29T15:49:55-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-09-29T15:49:55-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
    </author>
    <category term="bailout" />
    <category term="clusterfuck" />
    <category term="crash" />
    <category term="economy" />
    <category term="FAIL!" />
    <category term="house" />
    <category term="house of representatives" />
    <category term="paul krugman" />
    <category term="treasury" />
    <category term="us is screwed" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The bailout bill fails <a href="http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2008/roll674.xml">228-205</a> (link goes to roll call). Per <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/26/demolition-accomplished/">Paul Krugman</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
So what we now have is non-functional government in the face of a major crisis, because Congress includes a quorum of crazies and nobody trusts the White House an inch. As a friend said last night, we’ve become a banana republic with nukes.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Dow is off 681 as of posting time (moving between 500-700 off). What an unbelievable clusterfuck.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The bailout bill fails <a href="http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2008/roll674.xml">228-205</a> (link goes to roll call). Per <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/26/demolition-accomplished/">Paul Krugman</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
So what we now have is non-functional government in the face of a major crisis, because Congress includes a quorum of crazies and nobody trusts the White House an inch. As a friend said last night, we’ve become a banana republic with nukes.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Dow is off 681 as of posting time (moving between 500-700 off). What an unbelievable clusterfuck.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Why I&#039;m a wee bit optimistic this morning</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iheartirony.com/content/why-im-wee-bit-optimistic-morning" />
    <id>http://www.iheartirony.com/content/why-im-wee-bit-optimistic-morning</id>
    <published>2008-09-29T08:17:09-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-09-29T08:17:09-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>emily</name>
    </author>
    <category term="2008 election" />
    <category term="obama" />
    <category term="politics" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The Rovian construct (parasailing, swift boats, flip-flopping) was to define the 2004 election on a question of Kerry: his character, ability to lead and record.<br />
The McCain people are having a terrible time with message control.  This election is about John McCain.  And it's not going well for him.<br />
Sample: NYTimes top stories today:</p>
<blockquote><p>
   1. Frank Rich: McCain’s Suspension Bridge to Nowhere<br />
   2. For McCain and Team, a Host of Ties to Gambling<br />
   3. Maureen Dowd: Sound, but No Fury<br />
   4. Bob Herbert: Palin’s Words Raise Red Flags<br />
   5. Behind Insurer’s Crisis, Blind Eye to a Web of Risk<br />
   6. Thomas L. Friedman: Green the Bailout<br />
   7. Nicholas D. Kristof: Impulsive, Impetuous, Impatient<br />
   8. Everybody’s Business: In Financial Food Chains, Little Guys Can’t Win<br />
   9. Op-Ed Contributor: Greenwich Time<br />
  10. Editorial Observer: Wasilla Watch: Sarah Palin and the Rape Kits
</p></blockquote>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The Rovian construct (parasailing, swift boats, flip-flopping) was to define the 2004 election on a question of Kerry: his character, ability to lead and record.</p>
<p>The McCain people are having a terrible time with message control.  This election is about John McCain.  And it's not going well for him.</p>
<p>Sample: NYTimes top stories today:</p>
<blockquote><p>
   1. Frank Rich: McCain’s Suspension Bridge to Nowhere<br />
   2. For McCain and Team, a Host of Ties to Gambling<br />
   3. Maureen Dowd: Sound, but No Fury<br />
   4. Bob Herbert: Palin’s Words Raise Red Flags<br />
   5. Behind Insurer’s Crisis, Blind Eye to a Web of Risk<br />
   6. Thomas L. Friedman: Green the Bailout<br />
   7. Nicholas D. Kristof: Impulsive, Impetuous, Impatient<br />
   8. Everybody’s Business: In Financial Food Chains, Little Guys Can’t Win<br />
   9. Op-Ed Contributor: Greenwich Time<br />
  10. Editorial Observer: Wasilla Watch: Sarah Palin and the Rape Kits
</p></blockquote>
<p>The McCain camp has been to busy with damage control to successfully spin Obama as a villanous half-Muslim elitist extremist.  Given their mounting desperation- and mounting deficit in polls- expect the ads to get pretty sickeningly nasty by the 3rd debate.</p>
<p>The ads we saw in New Hampshire this weekend (an image of Obama looming over a sleeping - ahem - white baby) are just starters.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>In which Jesse scripts Barack Obama&#039;s press releases</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.iheartirony.com/content/which-jesse-scripts-barack-obamas-press-releases" />
    <id>http://www.iheartirony.com/content/which-jesse-scripts-barack-obamas-press-releases</id>
    <published>2008-09-24T22:12:50-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-09-24T22:12:50-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>emily</name>
    </author>
    <category term="2008 election" />
    <category term="bail out" />
    <category term="debt" />
    <category term="economics" />
    <category term="obama" />
    <category term="politics" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="">Hotline on Call</a>, Obama's addendum to the bizarro joint release follows.  And look!  He added two nifty extra points of his own:</p>
<blockquote><p>I believe that several core principles should guide this legislation.<br />
First, there must be oversight. We should not hand over a blank check to the discretion of one man. We support an independent, bipartisan board to ensure accountability and complete transparency.<br />
Second, we need to protect taxpayers. There should be a path for taxpayers to recover their money, and to turn a profit if Wall Street prospers.<br />
Third, no Wall Street executive should profit from taxpayer dollars. This plan cannot be a welfare program for CEOs whose greed and irresponsibility has contributed to this crisis.<br />
Fourth, we must help families who are struggling to stay in their homes. We cannot bail out Wall Street without helping millions of families facing foreclosure on Main Street.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="">Hotline on Call</a>, Obama's addendum to the bizarro joint release follows.  And look!  He added two nifty extra points of his own:</p>
<blockquote><p>I believe that several core principles should guide this legislation.</p>
<p>First, there must be oversight. We should not hand over a blank check to the discretion of one man. We support an independent, bipartisan board to ensure accountability and complete transparency.</p>
<p>Second, we need to protect taxpayers. There should be a path for taxpayers to recover their money, and to turn a profit if Wall Street prospers.</p>
<p>Third, no Wall Street executive should profit from taxpayer dollars. This plan cannot be a welfare program for CEOs whose greed and irresponsibility has contributed to this crisis.</p>
<p>Fourth, we must help families who are struggling to stay in their homes. We cannot bail out Wall Street without helping millions of families facing foreclosure on Main Street.</p>
<p>Fifth, we both agree that this financial rescue package should move on its own without any earmarks or other measures. We have different views about the need for other action, but this must be a clean bill.</p>
<p>This is a time to rise above politics for the good of the country. We cannot risk an economic catastrophe. This is not a Democratic problem or a Republican problem – this is an American problem. Now, we must find an American solution.</p></blockquote>
<p>I look forward to McCain's response on Friday's debate.  Oh wait.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
